Talk:Digital hearing aid

This redirect is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles

Medicine

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles

Disability

Digital hearing aid is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Deaf

This redirect is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Hearing Aid → Digital hearing aid –

I can only presume that this is not a patented title; but rather is a generic thing or category, just like "analogy hearing aid", which appears in the main text. Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, I think the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upcased just because it is abbreviated with caps.

I haven't done a technical move request because there's a slight chance I might be wrong on the patented, commercial-name issue. Thanks. Tony (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should just be merged with Hearing aid which is being discussed on its talk page. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very good idea. Do you know how to prompt this? There's a template somewhere. Tony (talk) 10:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a link to the discussion on the article("It has been suggested that this article be merged into Hearing aid.") if that's what you mean. 331dot (talk) 10:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tsk, silly me. Tony (talk) 10:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry; I do that all the time. :) 331dot (talk) 10:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom (if the article is not merged). — AjaxSmack 02:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The phrase is usually lowercase, even when the abbreviation "DHA" is used: see this Google Books search. No opinion on the merge. Dohn joe (talk) 15:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.