This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
I don't think this page should be deleted (and it definitely doesn't qualify for uncontroversial deletion, which is what PROD is for). Differential K theory seems to easily pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines - of course saying that it's notable is completely independent from issues like whether it's debunked, fringe, correct, etc, etc. In any case, "walled garden of racialist research publications" is wrong. Personality and Individual Differences is peer-reviewed with respectable academics on its editorial board. https://www.elsevier.com/journals/personality-and-individual-differences/0191-8869/editorial-boardNPalgan2 (talk) 23:56, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You have misread my comments. Simply because Rushton managed to get it published in a more-or-less reputable journal doesn't change the fact that the only coverage of it from outside the walled garden of racialist publications has been criticism. And not much of that. So it's off to AfD, then. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPantsTell me all about it. 00:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Chmalyn: There's not much more to say about this fringe theory so rationally it should be merged into Race, Evolution, and Behavior, the book where this topic is mostly discussed. Onetwothreeip (talk) 02:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]