Talk:Derek Yu
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
_%22BIG_GOMEZ%22.svg)
Image copyright problem with Image:Eternal Daughter.gif[edit]
The image Image:Eternal Daughter.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
ad tag[edit]
Should the ad top tag be removed? I rewrote the page to make it less adversarial. I don't actually know what constitutes a page that's an ad from one that's simply well-balanced and includes controversy. Yu doesn't seem to be involved in much controversy, should I add some to make the page seem less advertisement-like, however? Or, rather, does anything need to be done to accomplish the goal of no ad tag because the page really isn't anymore? Fleetham (talk)
- Possibly mention the controversy around I'm O.K., though its own article covers that pretty well. This is far from a great article (through no fault of your own), but the ad tag could probably be removed. 143.92.1.32 (talk) 01:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)