Talk:Dee Dee Warwick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sutra Records/Kama Sutra[edit]

Re the statement in the "Later career" section that Dee Dee Warwick recorded for Sutra Records which was "a small independent label, not "Kama Sutra" as it was previously described": the Wikipedia article entitled Kama Sutra Records states "The record company ceased in mid-1976, but restarted in 1982 as Sutra Records. Under this moniker, [Art] Kass marketed and distributed Fever Records, Blue Dog Records, Baila Records, and signed and recorded the Cover Girls, the Fat Boys, Victor Willis, and many more before the company filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 1993." Is there corroboration for the statement that Dee Dee Warwick's affilitation with Sutra Records was with a small independent label distinct from the Sutra Records which was a revival of Kama Sutra operational from 1982 to 1993? Unless there is such corroboration I'd suggest that Warwick's label should simply be identified as Sutra Records and the differentiation of Sutra Records from Kama Sutra omitted.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dee Dee Warwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dee Dee Warwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Surname[edit]

I assume that she changed the spelling of her surname to match her sister - but when ? -- Beardo (talk) 22:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse allegations[edit]

Much of what's written here is uncited and seems to have a point of view that the allegations are untrue. This section needs to be rewritten from a more neutral point of view. 2603:8001:2A00:7428:4CDD:1E96:3289:1F95 (talk) 17:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well that section is a mess because only a fan of Whitney thinks that Warwick had sexually assaulted her, but other people would not think if it is true. TheGreatestLuvofAll ( chat with me ) 19:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]