Talk:Dayton, Ohio/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 15:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Overall summary[edit]
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehensive, well-referenced, well-illustrated, article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Article has 111 citations, which is good, but there are some unreferenced statements.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
This is a comprehensive article, generally well-referenced and well-illustrated. You have a few (about 8) broken web links (see [[1]]) and in places your citations are somewhat absent, so it would not make WP:FAC without improvements. But this is WP:GAN, so I'm awarding GA-status. I enjoyed reading this article and learnt a few things: I knew about Wright-Patterson AFB, but I did not know until know that the "Wright" was Wright the pioneer of flight. Congratulations on producing a Good Article. Pyrotec (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)