This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Why is it necessary to repeat a link that already appears in the "References" section? -- Trowbridge (talk) 02:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My position is that certain definitive links like an official site or a listing in an authoritative sports reference site (e.g. Baseball-Reference.com) should be included even if they are cited as a reference. When an article become well developed, its list of references can become quite long. It's useful have those definitive links isolated in a short list outside of the references. Jweiss11 (talk) 04:05, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
