Talk:Danuta Lato

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think Boobpedia is obviously inappropriate for inclusion... ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 13:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

204.15.6.99 vs. J.smith[edit]

According to J.smith any of the above mentioned material should not be included on this page. So I am deleting everything that is defamitory, controversial, unreferenced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.15.6.99 (talk) 13:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some biographical information and a link. The link is a blog site, but it has some personal information and it does not have overtly pornographic pictures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.15.6.99 (talk) 18:59, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

J.Smith has been waging a personal vendetta against anyone who edits this page. He has vandalized my posts, stating that my comments are, in his words, "defamitory, unreferenced and controversial." However, most of the material included in this page previous to my posts were all of the above. According to Wikipedia policy I am allowed to post material that is reasonably assumed accurate without reference. Now J.Smith is trying to get me blocked. This guy is really strange. I mean let's face it, how much reference material is out there for a pin-up girl. I am using general knowledge that I have for Danuta Lato that anyone can get in a chat room. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.15.6.99 (talk) 14:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahhahahaha... wow. So many things wrong with what you said I'm not even sure where to start. Review our policy's on the subject: verifiablity, bio of living persons & no original research. They say unsourced "facts" you get in a chat room is unacceptable. Those policies apply equally to every page on wikipedia.
You've never heard of boilerplate warnings? Check out {{uw-blp1}}, {{uw-blp2}}, {{uw-blp3}}, etc. They are there for a number of reasons... first and foremost they are to educate. They are for your benefit. The goal is that you'll stop disrupting the article and become productive. I'm trying to get you blocked? I am an admin and I have the power to block accounts/IP addresses. I don't want to see you get blocked. If I wanted you to be blocked I would have blocked you (you've given me reason enough). I would rather see you become a productive editor and actually help improve the article. Please please please review the three policies I've linked above. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 16:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First of all "J", all the facts that I have added are verifiable. But I know what you are going to say. That no matter where I get them, my sources are "unreliable", and you will delete them anyhow. Secondly, many of the other facts (ie, Yehuda Barkan) in this article, are also not referenced. But, of course, you can tolerate those facts, right? Lastly, just to prove your ignorance, you keep changing my edit from "West Germany in the 1980's" to "Germany in the 1980's." Dude, there was no Germany in the 1980's!!! German reunification did happen until 1990. That is the most verifiable fact in the whole article. But you couldn't care less about facts, all you want is an edit war. Why don't we take it to a third party for an arbitration. That is, if you have the stomach for it. 204.15.6.99 16:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to go read our WP:civility policy.
If you get your facts from a reliable source then I won't revert it. I judge sources based on the guidelines set forth in WP:reliable source in order to satisfy the requirements in WP:verifiability policy.
Do you want to know why I'm here? Danuta herself complained about the nonsense in this article. Oh, I've left your "West Germany" change - your right, I was wrong for reverting that part. The rest stays out until you find a source for it. Feel free to take this arbitration - I'm sure arbcon will maintain our policies. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 18:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are suggesting that I read the civilty policy, after your "haha..wow", comment?
You still didn't respond about the other unverified facts in the article. Because you know I'm right! Lastly, you claim to be in contact with Danuta herself. That's interesting, since she has not spoken with anyone else in over ten years. Why don't you post this alleged communication. Better yet, why doesn't she state her postion, publically for all of us to see. 204.15.6.99 18:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yup.
Blogs are not reliable sources. See Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources_.28online_and_paper.29.
Sorry, I'm not permitted to post private communications received by wikipedia's OTRS desk.
I haven't responded to your vague arguments since they are irrelevant to the discussion about the content under dispute.
Find a reliable source for your content and it can stay. However, vague original research is not permitted. WP:No Original Research ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 22:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 what?[edit]

There reads: It is believed Danuta Lato was born in 1963 / 25 November 1965. c. October 2007 in Szufnarowa, Poland.
"c. October 2007"? I take the "c" means 'about' or 'around', but is that whole part meant to imply she died in 2007? If not, what then? 85.217.20.15 (talk) 18:08, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Touch My Heart"[edit]

is sang by Patty Ryan, Danuta just is dancing in pantomim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.140.159.110 (talk) 08:08, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]