Talk:Daniel David

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Daniel David article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Romania

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I was one of poeple who participated in the elaboration of this article. I guess that all the information offered are verified and verifiable. I will explore egain the artcile to check that all info. is verified and balanced.

Alin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.151.33 (talk • contribs)

You consider this paragraph I deleted NPOV?

Considered by his peers a beautiful mind and a brilliant person, his research work was prized by major figures in the field. Thus, Dr. Albert Ellis said that "...his research work is a gem and it speaks about a young genius..." and Dr. Aaron T. Beck said that "...I do consider him one of the most knowledgeable people in regard to the basic cognitive science underlying cognitive therapy..."

And generally your article conflicts with the following Wikipedia policies: Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Let's discuss all the issues here (please do not delete the NPOV and cleanup tags until the discussion is over). Mentatus 07:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are correct. I was not the author of that text (maybe many people contributed); however, I after reading them, I have checked and found some of those references on the website (eg. at www.psychotherapy.ro); so, although they seem correct I agree it is too positive (for a living person!). It is good you took them out. However, the other comments seem correct and verifiable in my view.

Alin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.151.33 (talk • contribs)

I am sorry; I have posted that part of the text based on the reccomendations I found on the internet (serious ones see at www.psychotherapy.ro) and based on those presentations I attended myself when Dr. David was awarded various awards by his peers. However, I was not aware about the neutrality issue and indeed, the text is biased towards positive. So, I agree to delete that part of the text. (Mircea, Turda). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.79.125.134 (talk • contribs)

Well, the article seems balanced to me in this form. (Cosmin) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.231.19.85 (talk • contribs)

Interesting article and discussions. I did not know about the "Wikipedia" and but it is fun and useful (I guess). I know Daniel from various conferences (I am an assistant professor myself). He is like a magnet to people that is why he is so positively regarded. Just for curiosity, I have check the info. in professional sources and most of it is correct. Because he is not a magent to me (I think!) I have tempered to tone of the text and I have deleted all info. based on paraprofessional rather than professional sources. Based on this, I think it is correct to take out the tag (I will do it). If you do not agree with my actions (e.g., taking out some info., tempering the tone, taking out the tag) please let me know the reason and let us discuss (Dr. Ardelean Florin). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.123.87.200 (talk • contribs)

I guess some citations are still needed for the following statements:

"[..]by this Governmental position strongly influencing the reform of the postdoctoral programs in the Romanian educational system."

"Considering his background he represents a unique professional profile[..]"

"[..]he is the most cited Romanian psychologist in the international literature" (I could not find this statement confirmed on the Ad Astra website)

"[..]marked the reform of the clinical field in Romania, helping in moving the field from a '70s style approach to the modern one."

Please provide some sources (have a look also at the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy). Mentatus 14:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me tell where I found some of the info. Ad-Astra (http://www.ad-astra.ro/cartea-alba/authors.php?order=n_articles&domain_id=150) The other sources can be found in his presentation in various books of him made by the publishers (http://www.polirom.ro/cauta.cgi?action=cauta&class=search&autor=David) I guess that those who wrote the articles could post the references in the article. Dr. Ardelean.

To Dr. Ardelean: why did you take out the text related to the Thomsom ISI? To the moderator: as one of the authors I have put the references. (Alin)

I have made changes that point to a more objective point of view and I have added references to sustain the statements in the text. I have removed the POV label (Silviu Matu)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daniel David. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160313065841/http://clr.ro/monitorweb_doina_nupunemana/2008/052.pdf to http://www.clr.ro/Rep_dil_2002/..%5CMonitorWeb_Doina_nupunemana%5C2008%5C052.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Daniel David.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]