Talk:Crossbeam Systems

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computer Security: Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Stub

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Proposed merge with Blue Coat Systems[edit]

Vastly over-detailed article with questionable notability from WP:CORP, and 4 year old NPoV cleanup tag. Since the company was acquired by Blue Coat, what content here that is non-promotional should probably be merged there. FalconK (talk) 09:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have a former COI with BlueCoat. I did not previously know of this article's existence. Would definitely be willing to stub it and cleanup all the promotionalism if that's ok. That way whether it is merged or sent to AfD, no one in the community has to wade through all the spam. CorporateM (Talk) 20:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly wouldn't object! FalconK (talk) 23:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just reviewed CorporateM's suggested version, and it looks a lot better to me. I have edited the article to incorporate the changes (as always, I am responsible for edits I make) Please look it over. I think we may want to remove the merge tag now. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is greatly improved. I think we can remove the tag and keep this. FalconK (talk) 07:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks all. Does this mean we can remove the tag on the Blue Coat page indicating that a merge is under discussion or should it stay up longer? CorporateM (Talk) 20:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just WP:BOLDLY deleted the tag. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crossbeam Systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130202192046/http://www.scmagazineus.com/company-news-michael-ruffolo-named-ceo-at-crossbeam-plus-changes-at-fidelis-and-symantec/article/167970/ to http://www.scmagazineus.com/company-news-michael-ruffolo-named-ceo-at-crossbeam-plus-changes-at-fidelis-and-symantec/article/167970/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]