Talk:Critical embankment velocity

Trains High‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering infobox at the bottom[edit]

Hello, the engineering infobox at the bottom of the article is important for the article per se? Because it is so general. Great job for the rest. Fabio.quaglieri (talk) 12:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review! Yes, the infobox is a little bit general. But, I cannot find a specialized one. It may be improved in the following. Duomo Feng (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer 1[edit]

Hi Doumo,

The article is well-organized. Good work! WENQIAOJIAO (talk) 13:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC) --WENQIAOJIAO (talk) 13:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you bro! Best. Duomo Feng (talk) 13:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Observations and suggestions for improvements[edit]

The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in June 2022.

Unfortunatly I'm not an expert in this specific topic so I can't evaluate the scientific quality of the paper in a complete way (especially the last part of the paper).

My general comments are:

organisation of the paper is very good;
introduction to the problem is well explained;
figures could be better commented and cited (the first image is not representative of the phenomenon in my opinion or it could better described);
the language is not always clear and correct.

--BarettoDiArchitettura (talk) 08:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]