Talk:Crinum pedunculatum

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Crinum pedunculatum is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Relation between text and reference[edit]

This page (before I change it to its current url) was given as reference for

The differences between C. asiaticum and C. pedunculatum are subtle. The latter tends to be somewhat smaller, but has broader petals, giving it a less fragile appearance.

but I cannot^{[word changed by Peter coxhead (talk) 12:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)]} see how the content in the page is related to the referenced text. If there is no relation I think that the url should be moved to "external links" and another reference should be given for that text if necessary.--Canyq (talk) 03:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We can use that ref to reference other information in the article and leave a ^{[citation needed]} tag for that setennce. I'll do it now. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the page should really be merged with Crinum asiaticum as most of the reliable sources now treat it as merely a variety of this. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]