Talk:County of Foix

Couldn't Counts of Foix be integrated with their County of Foix? Would there be any objection, as long as an Administrator collated the Pages histories? The one doesn't make full sense without the other. Great individual Counts will retain their great individual biographies of course. And the List of counts of Foix remains a separate list... um, of counts of Foix...--Wetman 02:09, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Countship" of Foix![edit]

If "countship of Foix" appears in any reputable work of history, then I guess it wouldn't be a solecism. Where does one read of the "countship" of Foix? User:Fastifex is rapidly changinmg all instances of "county" to "countship". --Wetman 13:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Wetman, countship does not appear to be standard English usage. - SimonP 14:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why has this page been moved without consultation? Countship is not in common usage if at all. Giano | talk 14:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on County of Foix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110717225604/http://www.vivies.com/index.php?title=Caraman to http://www.vivies.com/index.php?title=Caraman

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]