Talk:Corporate blog/Archives/2013
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Links
I don't see any justification for any of the sites linked here. It's just people spamming links to their own blogs and advertising books about blogging. None of it is actually any useful or relevant content about corporate blogging that meets the External links policy. I'm going to remove the whole section until something more useful turns up unless anyone can justify keeping any of these links. Angela. 00:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Content
The content on this page tends to drift rather. It's not very cohesive, and the grammar could do with some work. I've added some tags accordingly. Andrewferrier 15:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Grammar
The entire thing looks like part of a corporate memo--I'm re-phrasing it so it sounds more like an encyclopedia article. Hope I'm not overstepping my bounds here. Nisada 17:15, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Wound up re-writing the "Internal Blog" section, the second list (which ref'd http://www.globalprblogweek.com/2005/09/19/dutto-internal-blogs/) was copied from another website, so I removed it. Removed a lot of stuff that seemed excess, but not sure if I went too far, so I'm waiting before I do anything else. Someone please provide feedback? Nisada 18:15, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I would like to request some additional info on this topic: How about the legal / discovery process ramifications of corporate blogs? Thanks! Not sure why this is appearing in grammar section, but I'd like to include it in the content section.
Doubt
34% of large companies had a blog in June 2006 [8] but according to [x] only an 8% of the Fortune 500... ¿?
[8] # ^ JupiterResearch, (June 26, 2006) JupiterResearch Finds That Deployment of Corporate Weblogs Will Double in 2006
I think this one should be removed in light of the research at the fortune 500 blogging wiki, a complete review of the fortune 500 was conducted in 2006, and that only came up with about 9% of blogs. The number has certainly grown, but I seriously doubt 34%. I am sure the jupiter survey was legitimate, they may just have had a problem with sampling.
[x] http://www.eu.socialtext.net/bizblogs/index.cgi
There are two websites that list all of the fortune 500 companies, the fortune 500 business blogging wiki estimates that 8% of the fortune 500 blog, as of 10/06/06.
The socialtext website is still around, the businessblogging summit wiki disappeared. The project was originally started by Easton Ellsworth, and now he and other volunteers are going to update the socialtext wiki. that's a real count not a survey. the numbers as of 12/09/07 were 9.2% of the fortune 500 blogging.