This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is notable in itself and for its journal which meets the criteria for notability applying to academic journals of being abstracted and indexed in selective databases. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I realize that this article does not fall under the criteria for speedy deletion, but I do think it lacks notability. If the academic journal is notable, then that may justify its own page - it does not make the CHS notable by relation. Per WP:ORG, "No company or organization is considered inherently notable," and "An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it." This article therefore needs some secondary articles showing that it is indeed notable. --Iamozy (talk) 20:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
