Talk:Connemara National Park

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Connemara National Park article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disambiguation questions[edit]

Sparrowhawk[edit]

In the section Connemara_National_Park#Fauna, the term sparrowhawk is included. This link leads to a disambiguation page. Could some knowledgeable person edit this link so it leads to a proper article? Thanks. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I led it to Eurasian Sparrowhawk but I'm not sure if its correct. Milnivri ^{talk contrib} 16:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect reference?[edit]

Reference 4 (" Connemara National Park. Retrieved 31 December 2006. "), cited in support of "Red deer once roamed the park, but were extirpated from the area 150 years ago. An attempt was made to reintroduce red deer to Connemara and a herd was established within the park", no longer includes any information in support of these statements, if indeed it ever did. I moved reference 4 to a more appropriate place in the text, and edited the paragraph on mammals to reflect the information currently available in the link. I retained the above sentences without citation. It's interesting information and it won't kill Wikipedia to leave it in without a reference -- unlike incorrect references, which make a mockery of Wikipedia's strict citation policy! 98.115.40.39 (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]