Talk:Communist Party of Bolivia (Marxist–Leninist–Maoist)

Bolivia Mid‑importance

	Bolivia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoliviaWikipedia:WikiProject BoliviaTemplate:WikiProject BoliviaBolivia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Merge[edit]

According to the Spanish-language article, this appears to be the same party as the Communist Party of Bolivia (Marxist–Leninist). It seems like the should be merged then. Charles Essie (talk) 03:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The text and references seems to suggest that Communist Party of Bolivia (Marxist-Leninist-Maoist) is ongoing, although perhaps now known as Maoístas Bolivianos, and Communist Party of Bolivia (Marxist–Leninist) survives primarily through the Revolutionary Left Front (Bolivia). Given the divergence in their history, alternative merges might be more appropriate; then again, perhaps best left as they are. Therefore, oppose. Klbrain (talk) 16:43, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]