Talk:Columbian Harmony Cemetery

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Columbian Harmony Cemetery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How[edit]

Tagging claims in the article with "how" is meaningless. If the citation said how things were done, it could be included. Moreover, ultra-specific information (such as how heirs were identified and contacted) is not encyclopedic, and should not be included. If a reader wishes to really dig into that, they could contact the D.C. Department of Health. The various detailed means by which things are done by bureaucracy is not necessary to document here.

As Template:How says, "The template is used to identify claims in articles, particularly if questionable, that need a citation to a reliable source." None of that is in question in the article. All sources used as of November 2020 are reliable. - Tim1965 (talk) 17:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]