Talk:Color quantization
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png){kind=small}
About hardware capable of displaying True Colour[edit]
In the article, right under "Definition - II", it says that "Many people don't have full-color (24 bit per pixel) display hardware."
This is actually not the case for quite a while, at least for personal computers. The only hardware widely-used today that isn't capable of displaying full-colour (or True Colour as it is usually called) is present in cell phones and similar devices, the displays of which can usually display only a couple hundred thousands of colours (as opposed to over sixteen million colours displayable using True Colour). I don't know of a single PC still used today that isn't capable of displaying True Colour, so perhaps this should be edited to reflect that fact (while mentioning that in the past even some PC hardware couldn't display True Colour).
Doccolinni (talk) 12:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- I've deleted the section, because as you say it's no longer true, and because it was mostly a rehash of what had already been said in the previous paragraphs. David (talk) 17:47, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Color quantization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060530144923/http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2000-April/012205.html to http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2000-April/012205.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609233403/http://www.informatik.uni-bonn.de/III/forschung/publikationen/tr/reports/IAI-TR-98-1.ps.gz to http://www.informatik.uni-bonn.de/III/forschung/publikationen/tr/reports/IAI-TR-98-1.ps.gz
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Self-advertizing[edit]
"Finally, one of the most promising methods is spatial color quantization, conceived by..." - according to who? This looks like shameless self-advertizing to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:6B0:2:2801:548:FE34:DC5B:3409 (talk) 11:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Made a simple change to fix this.RGB213 (talk) 19:33, 18 June 2019 (UTC)