Talk:Cloud Computing Manifesto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Cabal" seems to be a pejorative term. While I realize that Microsoft has used the term "cabal" to describe the consortium that developed the manifesto, I question the appropriateness of the way the term is used in the article. Is there a better way to describe it while retaining the controversy over the way that the manifesto was developed? I am reluctant to do the edit myself since (full disclosure) I am an employee of one of the companies who participated in the authoring of the document. Ktstevenson (talk) 13:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking heed of our WP:COI guidelines - in light of your good faith contribution and in spite of multiple references supporting the use of the word "cabal" I have replaced it with "consortium". Despite the critical nature of the article (which reflects the sentiment of the references) I would very much like to see the cloud manifesto succeed and I have a few ideas as to how that might be achieved which I would like to discuss with the relevant people - you can reach me at samj@samj.net. -- samj inout 10:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cloud Computing Manifesto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]