Talk:Clarion Fracture Zone (band)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Clarion Fracture Zone (band) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Disambiguation[edit]

Please see Help:Disambiguation as this article has since creation caused potential issues due to band borrowing name of a geographical feature. I have confirmed that at least since 2019 when nodule mining controversy started heating up disambiguation approach appears appropriate given mentions of geological feature in other articles in wikipedia. I suggest permanent solution by creation of disambiguation page Clarion Fracture Zone after move of this article to Clarion Fracture Zone (band) and for the moment at least, the rather large but uninteresting for most geological feature on the Pacific Ocean seafloor redirect from Clarion Fracture Zone (geology) to Clipperton Fracture Zone ChaseKiwi (talk) 11:16, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ChaseKiwi (talk · contribs) I'd suggest instead opening a WP:RM at this page, as the geological feature is the obvious primary topic. Also, the RfC tag should be placed above the question you are asking, which should be brief and neutral. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ok, will do. I have no experience of moves needing this sort of consideration. Changed talk page structure and apologise if initial post is not as neutral as intended. It was not clear to me, despite the Clarion Fracture Zone being a rather large and potentially distinct geological feature, how noteworthy it is as a separate topic, although have started some background reading of the few separate academic articles, having noticed one is quite recent. Certainly know that much that is note wothy is shared with the Clipperton Fracture Zone and therefore features in the scientific literature under the names Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone (a present wikipedia redirect) and Clarion-Clipperton fracture zones.ChaseKiwi (talk) 17:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replying because I got called by the bot. I can only say that I agree with ChaseKiwi

If I have misunderstood, and my comments are required on something else that is at issue, please rattle my cage. JonRichfield (talk) 18:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems obvious to move this to a clearer title and make a dab page, no need to wait for a long discussion. I am going to clean up the Clipperton FZ page which should really be for the CCZ, which is not a fracture zone but a region including both of the CFZs... – SJ + 19:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 October 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved, with consensus leaning in favour of a WP:NOPRIMARY situation. (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clarion Fracture Zone → Clarion Fracture Zone (band) – To allow creation of disambiguation page Clarion Fracture Zone after move of this article ChaseKiwi (talk) 17:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support: I've personally experienced this kind of confusion when myself and some friends knocked on the door of a Nuclear Blast Records facility we came across, thinking they were some kind of organization along the lines of, say, the Center for Land Use Interpretation. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 18:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. When I first saw this discussion listed, I thought the page was going to be about some sort of geographic feature. The change would be helpful in clarifying what the page is about, and presents no downside in terms of searching. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per comments in previous section. This actually began as a malformed RfC where the tag was placed at the bottom with nothing after it. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Summoned by bot) Support the move itself. I'm not sure I'm convinced a dab page is the correct solution (comes down to whether the geological feature is the primary topic — if it is, we'd want to redirect this page to Clarion-Clipperton_Zone#Clarion_Fracture_Zone and give that section a hatnote per WP:ONEOTHER), but either way this article shoulld be at Clarion Fracture Zone (band). Box of wolves (feed) 03:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support (Summoned by bot) the move itself, but echo the concerns of Box of wolves, that a dab page is probably not the optimum solution. Pincrete (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.