Talk:Citipes

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 July 2020 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs).

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Position in Elmisaurinae not found by the paper[edit]

Although it does recover Citipes as the sister taxon of Elmisaurus, the paper describing Citipes does not assign it to Elmisaurinae, but instead to Caenagnathinae. It seems in this paper that Elmisaurinae and Caenagnathinae are defined differently from the usage seen on Wikipedia. So what do we do about this? Zigongosaurus1138 (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Size, other physical characteristics?[edit]

Article seems very incomplete, as it does not say much concrete about the animal, apart from its classification. 130.233.11.83 (talk) 07:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. --A Cynical Idealist (talk) 05:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]