Talk:Chintamani (1937 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality issues[edit]

The POV and use of peacock words is quite serious, particularly in the later section. The problematic words are emboldened below. This type of writing is all too common unfortunately for Indian cinema related articles on wikipedia by fans.


Chintamani became one of the greatest hits of early Tamil cinema. Though Bhagavathar's first film Pavalakkodi had achieved considerable success, it is universally accepted that Chintamani was Bhagavathar's first mega-hit which made him a "superstar". The gramophone discs of Chintamani were also popular though M.K. Thyagaraja Bhagavathar did not sing the songs that were featured in them as he was not under contract with Saraswathi Stores which produced the records. Instead, the songs were sung by Thuraiyur Rajagopala Sarma.[4]

Chintamani also marked the debut in Tamil for Kannada actress Aswathamma who played the title role. Aswathamma acted in one more Tamil movie before her untimely death in 1939 due to tuberculosis. [4]

Meanwhile, Chintamani was a remarkable success. With the profits obtained from the movie, the owners of Rayal Talkies constructed a theatre in Madurai and named it Chintamani.[4][1] The famous Tamil writer Kalki wrote that the film has made such an impact on the viewers that the housewife would sing the song Mayaprapanchattil from the movie while preparing coffee in the morning and her husband would sing Rathey unakku kobam in order to please his sweetheart.[4]

Chintamani continues to inspire Sinhala film music to this day.


Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 08:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had used the term "superstar" because M. K. Thyagaraja Bhagavathar is regarded as the first "superstar of Tamil cinema" and this film was one of his first grand successes. That is the reason why I had specified the term within quotes. I don't think it is a peacock term. I could very well prove it that he was regarded as the "first superstar of Tamuil cinema".Thanks-RavichandarMy coffee shop 11:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first major star or major film is fine. "Super" star and "grand success" is not Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 15:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do have a look at this.. I believe AOL is reliable and unbiased...
http://www.nerve.in/news:253500157251
http://www.aol.in/bollywood-story/widow-of-late-tamil-superstar-dies-in-penury/2008081513539012000004/index.html
http://www.kollywoodtoday.com/news/chief-minister-gave-a-relief-amount-to-the-first-super-star-wife/
In all these articles, he is referred to s the "first superstar of Tamil cinema"
And these are articles by Randor Guy calling him the "first superstar" Just make a "Ctrl+F" search and you will find it.
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/mag/2004/05/02/stories/2004050200210400.htm
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/mp/2001/12/20/stories/2001122000100200.htm
It is a title accorded to him. I am not indulging in praise of M.K. T. or anything of that sort, but this is a generally accepted title of his. You see, if I were to mention that the Duke of Wellington is called "the Iron Duke" you cannot point it out as a peacock term, right. Similarly, M. K. Gandhi is known as "Mahatma". If I were to regard such a term as POV, then the article on Mahatma Gandhi would be having an NPOV tag on top of it. As for "grand success", let me look into it. :-) -RavichandarMy coffee shop 18:58, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chintamani (1937 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]