Talk:Chickasaw Council

Scouting Low‑importance

	Scouting portal Chickasaw Council is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Chickasaw Council is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kia Kima Scout Reservation[edit]

Merge content from Scouting in Tennessee and Kia Kima Scout Reservation to create a full council article. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 22:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

support Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 16:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Winter Camp/New Facilities[edit]

No information about winter camp is posted here, nor is there enough information about the new facilities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smchattstudent (talk • contribs) 09:32, September 22, 2014‎ (UTC)

Serving as an Example[edit]

@Johnpacklambert: I reverted your original edit because I saw the citation link had gone dead and figured you deleted the information thinking it was editorializing. In my opinion, the deleted information is worth including because it shows that this wasn't just normal membership growth in the segregated South and it supports the earlier assertion that "[t]he Chickasaw Council became a leader in racial integration in Scouting." If the issue is a non-encyclopedic tone, do you have a recommendation of better wording? Deflagro ^Contribs/_Talk 23:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We should not keep this. It is non-encyclopedic. The other information indicates enough, and is already way too promotional.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]