This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article seems very promotion, without any clear sources to support its assertions. Unless we can add more sources I suggest returning it to a stub and working back up from sources. ·:· Will Beback·:· 06:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Almost 10 years later, this problem persists. Unless an interested party cleans-up this article in the near future, I'll have a go at it...basically removing all OR, web-page references, POV, PROMO, etc. I will try to find some RS, but I anticipate the article will probably go down to a stub. Agricola44 (talk) 21:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It seems tome that the article is pretty well sourced except for the second paragraph. Maybe I need to look at the sources better. Carptrash (talk) 06:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the "sources" are web-pages, blogs, her own material, broken links, etc...all of which are strictly unacceptable for a BLP. Also, OR is unacceptable, as well. Unless you can find legitimate RS to support the text, those parts must be redacted. I didn't want to "intrude" on this article (as it were) if an interested editor is willing to have a go at clean-up. Is that the case with you? Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 15:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I'll spend much time on this. You can go ahead and reduce it to a solid stub. I read the article and think "That sounds like her" which I realize is a long way from what we need in the way of documentation. The fact that her papers are collected at the Joseph A. Labadie Collection is, to me, very meaningful Carptrash (talk) 17:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I will try to reduce it to a smaller form (maybe stub) in which all info is solidly RS'ed. Agricola44 (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Rev't ClueBot false positive, so it is reasonably well there. However, it's picture-heavy and looks CV'ish, so I may refine it a bit more. Agricola44 (talk) 22:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}