Talk:Championship unification

	Championship unification is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Professional wrestling#Disqualification|disqualification]] The anchor (#Disqualification) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling#Countout|countout]] The anchor (#Countout) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This whole article is pretty much wrong![edit]

Title unification is only when two (or more) titles combine into one. SilentRage 23:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

USWA[edit]

Someone should add the AWA and WCCW Tilte unification on the the examples of championship unification article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.157.240.203 (talk) 13:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Someone should check the USWa unification for mistakes

I forget what the unified WCCW and AWA title was called but it was NOT the USWA title, the name USWA didn't even exist until 1989 and was the combination of WCCW and the CWA after they had a falling out with the AWA, so that name is wrong MPJ-DK 09:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AJPw[edit]

someone should add the ajpw triple crown unifiaction

Fair use rationale for Image:Jericho Undisputed.jpg[edit]

Image:Jericho Undisputed.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep divas title leave women's title <sweetbabe2062>[edit]

Can we vote to keep the diva's championship because the women's has already done its time or combine the two into wwe new queen championship or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.218.112.28 (talk) 20:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you seem to think Wikipedia has creative control over WWE? ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 02:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn/Razor, Punk/Cena[edit]

Do these not count since both matches were unifying the same belt?LM2000 (talk) 22:34, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the recent Magnus/AJ situation would also fall under this category.LM2000 (talk) 22:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]