Talk:Champion of the Universe

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Real name[edit]

Is his real name spelled Tyrco Slatteris?

It's TRYCO SLATTERUS. Bluecatcinema 12:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Champion1.gif[edit]

Image:Champion1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project[edit]

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 12:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re-added what I wrote regarding the inconsistencies between the depiction of the Champion in She-Hulk 7-8 and prior published appearances. Will do so as often as necessary. Will accept suggestions for rewording, and would appreciate having the references placed in proper format, but the facts are indisputable. OHOTMUDU#2 describes the power Primordial as an innate part of every Elder of the Universe, and describes him in possession of this power well prior to the Champion's gaining of the Power Gem in Silver Surfer vol 3 # 18. Moreover, the concept of the Infinity Gems did not exist yet both when the Champion was described as in possession of the Power Primordial, nor when the Champion acquired his gem. Prior to Jim Starlin's retcon of the Soul Gems into the Infinity Gems in Thanos Quest #1, there was no "Power Gem" existing as a concept in the Marvel Universe, as it had not been written yet.

She-Hulk #7-8 directly contradicts this, claiming that the Champion's Power Primordial is sourced from the Infinity Gem, and that removing the gem depowers him to the point where "any" of her allies could defeat him. This contradicts prior descriptions of the Power Primordial, as well as the early appearances of the character wherein he possesses the Power Primordial but not the Power Gem. This is a clear inconsistency that I believe deserves to be noted.

Readded it again, shorter and edited to increase neutrality. People keep deleting it, despite proper sourcing. No one has come here to discuss why, or how this information can be added in a way that satisfies people. Will wait for that, and continue to readd as necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.11.31.200 (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]