Talk:Chameleon (Helloween album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Concept Album?[edit]

Chameleon is definitely not a concept album, I am making this judgement based on the unrelated lyrics and the statements made by Weikath in the expanded edition's interview (the three main song-writing band members had almost no collaboration). I'm going to remove the statement. If someone has proof from somewhere, they should put it back up, but with a citation (kudos to whoever noted the lack of a citation). Xanofar (talk) 23:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Background section reads like a review[edit]

Hardly objective and with a lot of (attitude fueled text enclosed like this). Could someone improve the section to make it more neutral. Some citations would be nice too.--TheHande (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chameleon (Helloween album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements:

Y All the start class criteria
Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Y At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year
Y A casual reader should learn something about the album. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article lacks complete listing of "technical" personnel as set out at =amg&sql=10:diftxqthld0e~T2 AMG. Also, to meet the more rigorous criteria of the revised B class, this article needs improved sourcing to help readers verify the accuracy of information. Additional improvements may also be necessary. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on B class in album articles. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 11:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Non-encyclopedic tone[edit]

Much of this article seems to be written more like a blog post or similar than an encyclopedia article. A lot of it needs to be rewritten. Liassica (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]