Talk:Century Institute
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
advertising for a ceased organization? I doubt it.DGG 02:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Not sure, the advert tag has been on since ages (maybe the organization even existed back then). But, leaving the advert question aside, why should the subject be notable? --B. Wolterding 08:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- The press attention it got when it was active. Thats the basic criterion. The reason it got the attention was the sponsorship and the quality of the students--for the perceived importance of it to the participating colleges, see the ghits. Perceived importance is notability.DGG 08:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, more precisely, the basic criterion is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The articles cites some university sources, which are not really independent. What are the press sources you are referring to? Also, this Google search doesn't give me too many hits (87 distinct), and even not all of these refer to the subject (although the search term is already quite specific). The notability of the participating colleges is out of question, but that would warrant a merger rather than a separate article. --B. Wolterding 18:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm adding the notability + sources templates again; maybe someone comes up with sources. --B. Wolterding 07:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, more precisely, the basic criterion is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The articles cites some university sources, which are not really independent. What are the press sources you are referring to? Also, this Google search doesn't give me too many hits (87 distinct), and even not all of these refer to the subject (although the search term is already quite specific). The notability of the participating colleges is out of question, but that would warrant a merger rather than a separate article. --B. Wolterding 18:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- The press attention it got when it was active. Thats the basic criterion. The reason it got the attention was the sponsorship and the quality of the students--for the perceived importance of it to the participating colleges, see the ghits. Perceived importance is notability.DGG 08:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Century Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040925104016/http://centuryinstitute.com:80/ to http://www.centuryinstitute.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)