Talk:Cecilio Putong

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Tambayan Philippines Start‑class Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cecilio Putong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141028223420/http://www.senate.gov.ph/lis/bill_res.aspx?congress=14&q=HBN-3724 to http://www.senate.gov.ph/lis/bill_res.aspx?congress=14&q=HBN-3724

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul, templates changed.[edit]

I've just completed an overhaul to deal with the tone of this article, among other issues.

The lead contained information about Putong's early life. This has been moved to its own section. There was an interpretation of one of Putong's essays that gave unattributed valuation of his work to his community. I removed this. I believe the tone of the article as it stands now justifies removal of the peacock template. If you disagree, please discuss here and I'll work to improve it further.

In the course of my revisions, I removed the sole source cited in the article. It was a government document showing the reversal of a renaming that attached Putong's name to a high school. It appeared to be in conflict with the article's statements about the renaming, and provided no useful information except that the school was no longer named after him. With or without that reference, there is absolutely nothing in this article that is sourced. I've applied the BLP no sources template.

Thanks! Skeletor3000 (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a BLP. --Racklever (talk) 07:30, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! You're right. Fixing the template. Thanks. Skeletor3000 (talk) 14:42, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]