Talk:Catholic and Royal Armies

Military history: European / French / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Main article?[edit]

I've been working on a few articles related to the royalist strife during the French Revolution and noticed with frustration that this page is redirected to War in the Vendée although the Royalist army and the War in the Vendée are two very different subjects (its as if "french resistance" was redirected to WW2...). The french wikipedia has an article for the Catholic and Royal Army and I believe it would be only fair and logical that all these links for the royalist army are directed to a true page dedicated to that army, rather than to the general war in Vendée. Just asking to get thumbs up to start this page which I will translate directly from the French article.Munin75 (talk) 19:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]