This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
What happenened to Hadrian's ashes? Was his tomb left alone during the various architectural changes that took place? Does it exist in any form today? Is there an ossuary?
Good question -- I just added a sentence on that to the article in case you want to see. I couldn't find anything definite. All that I could find is that the urns of imperial ashes have been missing for over a thousand years. There was never an ossuary to my knowledge -- that is a box that holds bones, whereas an urn is a smaller container holding ashes. Mlouns 06:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Encyclopedia Romana on the Lacus Curtius site (linked from article) says that the Goths scattered the ashes in 410 when they sacked Rome. Mlouns 06:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In Assassin's Creed Brotherhood the Castel is depicted as being inside the Vatican. Was this ever the case? Have the Vatican's boundaries changed significantly or was the game just using artistic license? 130.159.84.44 (talk) 17:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So is this fortification part of the territory of Vatican City? Or of Italy? If it is part of Italy (which I suspect is the case) what were the details of its transfer (or forcible possession)? If I recall my modern Italian history correctly, the 19th century Popes weren't very keen on the idea of a secular state in control of Rome. -- llywrch (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pope is written with a capital letter: "Pope", not "pope". In my opinion, this edition is good. I want to improve. Are there any objections? Subtropical-man talk (en-2) 17:12, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at several online grammar sources, there appears to be consensus that when used as a title "pope" is capitalized but when "pope" denotes a job position, it doesn’t require a capital. For example, this site gives the examples: Pope John Paul II gave the sermon on Easter Sunday, and The pope always gives the sermon on Easter Sunday. The version you are referring to does not appear to follow that guideline. Deli nk (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is supported by several printed style manuals I have. — Robert Greer (talk) 16:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
More particularly, WP:MOS, which is the applicable resource you can consult for use within this encyclopedia, would generally prevail even if other style manuals happened to differ. Robert Greer's usage examples are in alignment with WP:MOS. So in this usage context "pope" is correct. FeatherPluma (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
