Talk:Cardiff Town Hall

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cardiff High‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cardiff, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cardiff-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CardiffWikipedia:WikiProject CardiffTemplate:WikiProject CardiffCardiff articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removal of templates[edit]

I am unclear as to why the page does not comply with Wikipedia's layout guidelines or how there is excessive detail, if there was any less, it would be a stub. SethWhales^talk 09:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. User:Domdeparis, please give you rationale for adding these templates. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hi the templates may not have been the most appropriate but I left a message on the creator's talk page to explain my concerns with the readability of this article. [1] the article is not on my watch list it may have been improved since. Domdeparis (talk) 06:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

have a look at the article as it was when I tagged it and you may understand why. If you don't agree or you feel that it does comply now feel free to remove the tags. There is a link that explains when it is appropriate to do so. I see that the page creator did make some modifications after my message. Domdeparis (talk) 06:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Domdeparis, thank you, that is helpful. I think the article has now been improved sufficiently to merit the removal of these tags. However, there is still scope for improvement, possibly by introducing subsections on the architecture, history, usage, etc. of some of the buildings. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:43, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

Should the article be titled Cardiff Town Halls, because it describes several town halls? Verbcatcher (talk) 23:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]