Talk:Candid (app)

Apps Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Critisism & Controversy[edit]

Harmful Opinions, a semi-prominent Youtube content creator, heavily criticized Candid and multiple other content creators for misleading advertisements. It's a big part of Candid in most circles where it's popular. I'll be happy to add that, with a go-ahead. D Oh Double Gee (talk) 06:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

         Oh yeah, and maybe the child porn thing. In essence: Due to the AI that Candid uses, child porn is really easy to trade. Here's video a from Harmful Opinions (not quite. He had his channel taken down. This is from a archive chanel.)D Oh Double Gee (talk) 06:11, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious Non-NPOV[edit]

Read it, it's such a biased article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by -insert valid name here- (talk • contribs) 17:30, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would you care to explain how it's biased? If you legitimately feel there's an issue with the article or cited sources, such as it being WP:BIASED, you should list it so it can be addressed and potentially corrected. 51.37.42.246 (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]