This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Curling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of curling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CurlingWikipedia:WikiProject CurlingTemplate:WikiProject CurlingCurling articles
I have assessed this as a Stub, as it does not cite any sources and does not contain much prose. I have assessed this as low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 23:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
thank you @arjayjay for correcting my two corrections, on this and one other page!
I was having some trouble (as proved by the result) either with the editor on my phone or with my own eyes this morning. I have checked Wikipedia for "went on to to" and it is now clear. jw (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
