Talk:Cal State LA station

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Are two infoboxes needed?[edit]

Are two infoboxes with almost exactly the same information needed in the article? PeterEastern (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'll consolidate them. Infobox Station was meant to handle multiple services at once. Mackensen (talk) 18:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, much better. All the article needs now is a image - I am sure someone will provide one soon. PeterEastern (talk) 20:00, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Having two of them there was only supposed to be temporary. I was kind of hoping we could merge elemnts of the standard infobox into the LACMTA one. ----DanTD (talk) 20:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no view particularly about which infobox to use but do see the logic of using the LACMTA one. I will leave it to others to make any further changes. Why don't you give it a go DanTD and change it? (WP:Bold) PeterEastern (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I tried. Some of the Metrolink parameters wouldn't show up, though, and it wouldn't accept any other owner besides LACMTA. According to the Metrolink site, the station is owned by Cal State. ----DanTD (talk) 02:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]