Talk:Cadbury Report

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Factual Accuracy Problem[edit]

Robert Mazwell died in November 1991 not in 1990 as stated. In May 1991, the Financial Reporting Council, the London Stock Exchange and the accountancy profession had already set up a committee on the "Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance."

Patience62 (talk) 22:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever he died, his name is Maxwell. 'Already' is spelt thus. 86.185.221.149 (talk) 18:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resources[edit]

Articles relevant to this page:

Pages 47-48 of Corporate Law and Governance discusses this. I'm reluctant to add it until I know a bit more. II | (t - c) 01:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance[edit]

I think The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance is the official name of this report, so I have create a redirect page from there to here.

--Kevinkor2 (talk) 20:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History lesson: Cadbury 1992[edit]

"According to The National Computing Centre..." is not followed by a statement or statements, and therefore makes no sense itself as a statement. I find it hard to see the intent of this section. It sorely needs reworking. "Pij" (talk) 23:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: "No one individual has powers of decision" is a statement, or independent clause, but the other lines are not. "Pij" (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]