Talk:COVID-19 vaccine
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the COVID-19 vaccine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 45 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
WikiProject COVID-19 consensus WikiProject COVID-19 aims to add to and build consensus for pages relating to COVID-19. They have so far discussed items listed below. Please discuss proposed improvements to them at the project talk page.
To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to . |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Page notices, consensus, and readership | |||||
|
Updated Advice Needs Updating[edit]
"In April 2021, Astrazeneca and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) updated their information for healthcare professionals about AZD1222."
Given this, could the article expand on what was meant by "causal relationship" between the vaccination and the occurrence of thrombosis? For even if the adverse reactions where said to be "very rare", by how much had they "exceeded what would be expected in the general population"? Also, could the EMA Statement be updated to include their last advice on vaccination and any risk of thrombosis? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.237 (talk) 20:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- EMA stated in writing, as do the manufacturers, that the vaccines do not, and were never intended to, stop or reduce transmission. The article should be edited to be truthful 85.94.248.27 (talk) 20:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Discussion of a questionable (now retracted) study suggesting "dangers of mRNA vaccines"[edit]
Sadly discovered this posted by a relative who doesn't like the vaccine, but it is concerning.[1] Doug Weller talk 10:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Junk, non-peer-reviewed journal and a rogues' gallery of contributors. Some sane commentary on it here.[2] Bon courage (talk) 10:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- My browser showed me this[3]. Doug Weller talk 11:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Published by Cureus, a definite red flag. @Bon courage seeing this [4] RSN? Doug Weller talk 13:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- MDPI journals already listed at WP:RSP. Myself, I would probably never use this journal for health claims. Bon courage (talk) 13:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- How is that MDPI? Anyway, going to RSN now. Doug Weller talk 14:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- O yes, it's not MDPI. It's Springer Nature (?!). Bon courage (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- same people, same argument, different publisher.[5] Doug Weller talk 14:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- O yes, it's not MDPI. It's Springer Nature (?!). Bon courage (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- How is that MDPI? Anyway, going to RSN now. Doug Weller talk 14:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- MDPI journals already listed at WP:RSP. Myself, I would probably never use this journal for health claims. Bon courage (talk) 13:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Published by Cureus, a definite red flag. @Bon courage seeing this [4] RSN? Doug Weller talk 13:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- My browser showed me this[3]. Doug Weller talk 11:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Just to cap this off: Cureus (unusually) retracted the article.[6] Bon courage (talk) 13:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the end of the section "Adverse Events", after the part with tinnitus, the following references could be added, showing no signs of an increased rate of lasting vestibular damage:
https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15546 https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000003275
It could read like this: "Compared to pre-pandemic cohorts, no increased rate of lasting peripheral-vestibular damage has been shown in observational studies [ref 1, 2]." J.Q.G. (talk) 07:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not done Would need secondary sourcing per WP:MEDRS. Bon courage (talk) 07:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class COVID-19 articles
- Top-importance COVID-19 articles
- WikiProject COVID-19 articles
- B-Class Disaster management articles
- Top-importance Disaster management articles
- B-Class pharmacology articles
- Top-importance pharmacology articles
- WikiProject Pharmacology articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- Top-importance medicine articles
- B-Class emergency medicine and EMS articles
- Top-importance emergency medicine and EMS articles
- Emergency medicine and EMS task force articles
- B-Class pulmonology articles
- Top-importance pulmonology articles
- Pulmonology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine articles
- B-Class virus articles
- Top-importance virus articles
- WikiProject Viruses articles