Talk:Burnham Beeches

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Untitled[edit]

Hi

Just noticed a couple of little mistakes.

Burnham Beeches is in SL2 not SL1 postcode and the telephone code is 01753 not 01628. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.130.228 (talk) 20:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Folklore & Witchcraft[edit]

Apart from the picture of the Druid Oak there is no mention of folklore and stories of witchcraft that Burnhan Beeches is known for.

No mention of the early Pagans/Druids (hence the name of the Oak), or the later day Wiccan activity such as that of the Clan of Tubal Cain.

The area is known to have played host to a variety of witchcraft and Satanic activity throughout modern and ancient times, so surely some reference to this is justified?

In the same way Dracula (Nosferatu) and Goths are synonymous with Whitby, such is the case with various forms of witchcraft and Burnham Beeches - surely worth a mention as significant folklore? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.119.16.122 (talk) 13:13, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burnham Beeches. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160124163406/http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1000513.pdf to http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1000513.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burnham Beeches. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613025526/https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/0579B61A-0927-401E-A9CA-FDBB7C55D0DF/0/OS_BB_manage9905.pdf to https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/0579B61A-0927-401E-A9CA-FDBB7C55D0DF/0/OS_BB_manage9905.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]