Talk:Buku Harian Nayla

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

not only this serial..
raam (the satan) punjabi has published these:

Bintang based from Putri Huan Zhu
Impian Cinderella based from Frog Prince
Cincin based from Beautiful Days
Cinta 100 Hari based from My Crazy Love
Siapa Takut Jatuh Cinta based from Meteor Garden
Demi Cinta based from Love
Ciuman Pertama based from Itazura na Kiss
Atas Nama Cinta based from Stairway to Heaven
Penyihir Cinta based from Magician Love
I Love You, Boss based from Bright Girl’s Success Story
Pengantin Remaja based from My Little Bride
Benci Jadi Cinta based from My Girl
Janji Jaya based from My name is Kim Sam Soon
Benci bilang cinta based from Princess Hours
Liontin based from Glass Shoes
Katakan Kau Mencintaiku based from Sad Love Song

Well, if I am not wrong, 'Penyihir Cinta' is actually get the license. --Calupict! 02:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what gitu loh?[edit]

And then?

Will it kill you if he plagiarizes all the time?

If the answer is YES, i hope it won't take too much time.

KOMENTAR LU GAK PENTING BANGET GITU LOH. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.94.120.173 (talk) 17:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Betul2[edit]

this article seems to be offending too much to the serial. The sentences, such as

This drama completely plagiarizes a Japanese drama 1 Litre of Tears

or The drama allegedly plagiarizes a Japanese television drama titled 1 Litre of Tears

is too offensive and i considered these sentences as not neutral.

so is it wrong that i've erased them? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.94.120.173 (talk) 17:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Allegedly' comes from the word allegation. 'Allegation' is a synonim from 'accusation'. I'll change the word so it will be easier to understand.--Calupict! 02:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is Wikipedia![edit]

This is wikipedia, an online wikipedia.
This is not your homepage
This is not your bulletin board or forum
This is not a place where you can put your hatred.
This is not a battleground

Thus, for you, especially Indonesian Wikipedia who hate this series and want to edit the article:
1. review your English first
I found a lot of typographical errors. (and I was still dissastified with them after I tried to fix some of them)

2. Be Neutral!
Don't use strong words especially if the matter hasn't been legally resolved. Had the original producer sued this series? You can learn from The Matrix article in subsection Sophia Stewart legal case.

3. Put more information about the series
Who are the actors (not only the main actor and actress)? Who are the director? Who are the producer? How many episodes this series have? You can learn from Babylon 5

4. Put more citations
For example, the articles said She said this during an interview with Bintang Indonesia. Which edition? What month? What year?

Since the creator of this article criticized the series for copyright law, which part of copyright law being violated? Which article? Was this series illegal or was it just unethical? Kunderemp 18:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I changed the word from 'completely' to 'allegedly' to 'accused' because the matter had not been resolved at the court.

As for copyright matter, let see the Oldboy article. There is a bollywood movie namely Zinda which has striking resembelances with Oldboy. I suggest we use this article as the guidance for Buku Harian Nayla.

Then, for the english matter, please somebody be kind to review the english at the article. By the way, don't bite the newbie.--Calupict! 03:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops.. Sorry for my arrogance.

I have tried some reviewing the english before I wrote the above warning.

Thx for adding another example for reference. Kunderemp 04:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In 2005, there were article titled "Similarities between Babylon 5 and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine". First, it part of Babylon 5 article and then it separated into itself. And then, it sparked controversies and someone requested for deletion. There were votes and you can read the archive of votes in Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Similarities between Babylon 5 and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.

The page is no longer exist. I did not know what had happened. I wonder whether such a page is allowed in wikipedia. Kunderemp 05:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think as long as we can keep the neutral point of view; it will be alright.--Calupict! 05:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello, you got good points there but somehow i also found some typographical and grammar error in your stuff.. Maybe you should try to fix yours first. =) I've fixed some of yours. And fixed some on the page too. =) cheers. 218.186.9.1 19:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC) hi. this was me. [[[[[sylvdoanx]]]]] 19:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dear anonymous from 218.186.9.1.

Yeah.. I'm sorry for my arrogance. I saw my mistake in talk history. I did laugh when I saw them. Did I wrote that? Tee hee hee.. Kunderemp 08:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The updates[edit]

I add Television Series Box which I copied from Buffy. I also add the cast list and remove the RCTI link because the link is broken one.--Calupict! 01:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Buku Harian Nayla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]