Talk:British National Party/GA1
GA Review[edit]
I am quick failing this article for presence of {{pov}} and {{citecheck}} templates, as well as some improperly formatted cites (#22 is a bare link, for instance). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
The reason that cite #22 is a dead link is because the BNP, following an internal row at the end of 2007, got rid of its then web editor and a new web editor has totally revamped their site. The citation was accurate at the time it was made (or it would have been immediately deleted, I'm sure). The same will apply to some other citations quoting the BNP website, despite the efforts of several editors to re-source the affected sources citations. Although there has been a measure of success with this, there still remain others that have not yet been traced through Internet archives. Emeraude (talk) 17:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC)