Talk:Brigandine

Coat-of-plates

is this the same kind of armour that some people call a coat-of-plates? I have heard this term used in reinatcment groups and on there webpages. I was wondering it they were they same. If so it should be noted here.

Could be... might have to Google 'Coat-of-plates' to see if it and brigandine are the same thing. Mytwocents 19:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

A coat of plates is similar, and an anticedent of the brigandine. But it has far fewer plates and is articulated differently. Sethwoodworth 10:11, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Picture rights?

That looks like a White Rose Armoury Brig, do we have rights to use that picture? Where did it come from?

The picture comes from a students personal page at Columbia University http://www.columbia.edu/~ns189/armour/armoury_page.htm He describes how he made the brigadine himself. I changed the rights tag to {:PD-US}

• Why is it in the public domain? Did he specifically say that it's in the public domain? If not, then it is copyrighted. --BRIAN0918 00:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Brigandine

Did the name come from the word brigand, which is another word for a bandit and outlaw? AllStarZ 17:28, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

If I recall correctly, the original brigands were spearmen and both the name for a bandit and a type of armour derive from this. I will try to find a reference. Gaius Cornelius 17:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I have it. See here Gaius Cornelius 16:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Conflicting Statements about Cost

The page on mail ("chain mail") says that mail was more expensive than plate.

This page says that plate was more expensive than mail.

69.95.253.248 18:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I would have to imagine that full plate would have been more expensive, as it is extremely difficult to adjust the fit of plate armor to the individual when compared to chain maille (and ill fitting armor can be almost as bad as not having armor at all, since it will slow down even the strongest individuals). Plate armor also requires a great deal of skill and/or specialized equipment to make; chain maille simply requires a vast amount of time and enough metal rings (which are not difficult to make). While chain maille is very time consuming to make, it requires a great deal less steel than full plate and is considerably easier for the average person to repair (since it doesn't require a forge). I don't have any references to back up my own experiences, so my opinion is almost certainly moot. --Dragon of the Rust (talk) 05:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Hand labour was not valued much in the Medieval, but raw material and master armoursmith's experience were. So, plate armour was waaaay more expensive, not only because it required a lot more metal to make (and metal of much higher grade, no doubt), but also because it could only be made by a master with decades of experience. A chain mail, on the other hand, could easily be made from simple iron by apprentices, as its production required little more then a large amount of repetitive hand labour. 95.79.107.86 (talk) 07:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Advantage

The advantage a brigandine had over a plate cuirass was that it allowed greater flexibility of movement. Some men-at-arms seem to have considered the greater flexibility offered by the brigandine outweighed the lower level of protection it afforded.Urselius (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

the origins section

The first sentence isn't just dubious. It's flat out wrong. for reference, the article claims: "Brigandines have been used by armies from earliest recorded history [Jeremiah 46:4 KJV].[dubious – discuss]"

Assuming that the reference is the King James Version, the only thing that particular translation of that particular verse can be used, in relation to the article is to say that brigandines existed sometime before 1611. Why? The translation was completed in 1611, and it was only began in 1604. That is certainly not a citation 'from the earliest record'

Being a document which was (essentially) written in the 17th century, it is a very, very poor source to indicate what sort of armor was being worn in the time the Book of Jeremiah was being written (Jeremiah lived in the late 7th to early 6th century, BC. I forget when the book was actually written). It might be somewhat interesting to see why the translators choose 'brigandine' over other options of words. I suspect, however, it has more to do with style than being a literal choice, but that choice doesn't mean it was being worn in the 6th century, and then, most likely, it won't be of interest to the article.

For reference, most translations seem to translate the source-word as being either 'coat of mail' or simply as 'armor'. (translations as found here) the attendant commentaries all appear to be discussing the KJV, but generally state that they meant some type of mail, noting that 'brigandine' is 'the armor worn by brigands', and explaining that 'brigand' was originally meaning 'soldier'. I'm going to have to pull out a concordance and lexicon to get to the original word, but I doubt the original author of Jeremiah meant a coat of leather or cloth coat, fitted with moderately sized plates on the inside (or outside, even).

I think the easiest (and perhaps best) fix would simply be to delete the sentence. That the KJV mentions brigandines doesn't really matter much, in the scheme of things. I'll do this in a few days if I'm not mobbed with moderately good reasons not to. Thedanomyte (talk) 05:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Please check my re-wording; hopefully that resolves the issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A Georgian (talk • contribs) 18:48, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Jamestown findings

Continued archaeological digs at the Jamestown site have unearthed "brigandine armor plates" in addition to the Jack already referenced in the article. Unsure if they are really brigandine armor plates or just another Jack? Perhaps someone better versed can make the addition? http://historicjamestowne.org/august-2016/ Level3Sentry ❯❯❯ Talk 11:10, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brigandine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511235642/http://www.historicjamestowne.org/news/jack_plate.php to http://historicjamestowne.org/news/jack_plate.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)