Talk:Bridge 9 Records

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 December 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles

Record Labels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Boston Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as Low-importance).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.punknews.org/article/36946/videos-vinyl-vlog-talks-to-bridge-9-anchorless-records-black-cobra

Notability[edit]

plenty of the bands on the label have toured with mainstream artists such as ministry, at least one has had large mention in the media in relation to a death, and many have toured internationally in europe and the US. Ted, stop going after Ramallah - this seems to constitute harassment.Dean Sayers 21:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not meet the standards of WP:MUSIC. If the label is that notable, you should have no trouble identifying reliable sources that indicate that it is. -- TedFrank 21:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, you put up the tag. You concern yourself. Anyways, where in the WP:MUSIC page are labels mentioned?Dean Sayers 22:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As an active member of the hardcore scene to which Bridge 9 records caters to I can assure you they are most certainly a notable record label. Within the hardcore scene Bridge 9 records is well known as a label that has put out records for bands who draw hundreds of people at their shows. Also, it is covered frequently on sites like the punknews.org which is devoted to the sub culture in which the label resides which I believe qualifies it under the 5th part of the "others" category, since hardcore itself is without a doubt notable.Bungoman 00:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This label is very notable in the hardcore genre of music. It has put out numerous cd's for bands that have been very influential in hardcore. - Mpete510 14:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funny, this label probably divides more than it bridges. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.195.210 (talk) 20:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article appears to be written by the people involved in the record label. At the least, the inside jokes should be taken out. I think it is notable, though. (128.135.24.139 (talk) 01:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bridge 9 Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929131548/http://www.stuffmagazine.com/hype/review.aspx?id=11999&src=jb260 to http://www.stuffmagazine.com/hype/review.aspx?id=11999&src=jb260

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:43, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]