Talk:Boroqul/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 20:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article. 20:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Infobox[edit]

  • List his birth year of c. 1162 in the infobox
  • Done

Lead[edit]

  • Is there a translation of Boroqul's name in the traditional Mongolian script? Russian Wikipedia says ᠪᠥᠷᠥᠬᠦᠯ while Chinese and Korean Wikipedia say ᠪᠦᠷᠭᠦᠳ Does any source verify?
  • Not that I can find, sadly.
  • Remove the comma after "inner council"
  • Done

Life and career[edit]

  • Remove the comma after "Börte"
  • "The Secret History of the Mongols" → "[[The Secret History of the Mongols]]"
  • Mention what The Secret History of the Mongols is
  • Remove the comma after "Jurkin tribe"
  • Who was Jebe?
  • Italicize Jami' al-tawarikh
  • 1217-18 → 1217–18 (endash)
  • All done.

References[edit]

  • All sources look good

Overall[edit]

  • Single image is good. I assume no free images (if at all) of Boroqul exist
  • That is sadly correct.
  • Move the image to the right side so that Ögedei "faces the text" if you get what I mean
  • Done.
  • Stable
  • No war edits
  • Focused on topic

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

@AirshipJungleman29: I've left some comments for the review. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 22:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.