Talk:Bonnet (headgear)

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edit war[edit]

Previous edit was a shot in an edit war, when consensus hasn't been reached. Please cease and desist until the community reaches consensus. The Editrix 12:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one who's unilaterally trying to impose her strange categorizations on Wikipedia, without even having the common decency to offer the remainder of us peons on Wikipedia one single shred of meaningful explanation. The fact that you've been silent on your user talk page for three days now (while very actively editing on Wikipedia all the while), indicates that you have no meaningful explanation to offer -- and that being the case, I feel no hesitancy in reverting to the categories that were there before you started unilaterally imposing your individual agenda. Frankly, your high-and-mighty accusations of "edit-warring" don't go very well together with your refusal to offer any meaningful explanation for your uncooperative unilateral actions (which others have called into question as well as my self).Churchh 13:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone with information to offer should be editing articles. Leave categories and lists for those who have little information? --Wetman 07:11, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nebraska[edit]

...comes a little out of left field, doesn't it? - Gobeirne (talk) 21:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused.[edit]

I don't have access to the OED, but the online Merriam-Webster defines "brim" as "the projecting rim of a hat" and "rim" as "the outer often curved or circular edge or border of something." Now, the first two pictures of bonnets both have what I would call an outer, curved border projecting from the body of the headpiece. This seems to make our definition in contradiction to our illustrations. [MW gets around this by offering two quite separate definitions for three different kinds of headgear, only one of which is brimless.Kdammers (talk) 11:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bonnet (headgear). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929090914/http://www.gameo.org/encyclopedia/contents/b668me.html to http://www.gameo.org/encyclopedia/contents/b668me.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Babies section[edit]

In this section there is a "See also" reference to Coif, which seems untethered from the specific section. Coifs are not specific to infant headgear, and are not generally a style used for infant bonnets (which usually have a front or full brim to shade the eyes). Can we consider changing that section's "See also" to something specific to infant fashion or infant headgear, or just removing it? 50.107.166.104 (talk) 10:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bridgesp (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]