Talk:Blue Moon Rendering Tools

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

With all due respect to the "Pixie" renderer, is it appropriate that it's singled out as an alternative here on the BMRT page? ERobson 05:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I agree. It seems kindof like someone hacked the page into a pixie advertisement. Joeedh 02:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Amid the acquisition, Pixar sued Gritz and Exluna (now NVIDIA) for a variety of patent, trade secret, and copyright issues that were flatly denied by Exluna" - this sentence is ungrammatical and I can't make sense of what it is intended to say. Are the words "sued" or "pressed charges" missing (I'm only guessing because of the term "flatly denied" - what was flatly denied? --67.214.251.202 (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They should bever have quit teaching sentence diagramming ...

"sued" is the fifth word in the sentence. Pixar sued Exluna and Gritz. To be more correct, Pixar brought suit in a court of law claiming damages. Exluna and Gritz were the defendants. (Yes, in civil court there aren't 'defendants' but I forget the correct term at the moment.)

Pixar sued for "patent, trade secret, and copyright issues" which is not exactly correct. They sued for damages and based their claim on patent, trade secret and copyright regulations. But you get the idea .. or maybe not :)

Gritz and Exluna "flatly denied" the claims (i.e., damages based on patent, trade secret and copyright regulations.)

Yes, the sentence is not written in the best journalistic style but it is understandable. Maybe I'll go change "flatly" to "categorically" ... 210.22.142.82 (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"precursor to Gelato"???[edit]

How so? Could someone possibly elaborate on the statement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.130.6.148 (talk) 21:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blue Moon Rendering Tools. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051110134703/http://www.renderman.org:80/RMR/OtherLinks/blackSIGGRAPH.html to http://www.renderman.org/RMR/OtherLinks/blackSIGGRAPH.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]