Talk:Blogcritics

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest and neutral point of view.

Alan Kurtz (talk · contribs) This user has not edited the article.
Barbara Barnett (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blogcritics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Blogging Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 8 May 2007, see discussion.
Keep, 6 November 2005, see discussion.

NPOV[edit]

This article reads like an advertisement. Listing the 'attractions' of the site is not encyclopedic. Black-Velvet 18:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I've removed the attractions, but it really needs a major overhaul. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:57, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia use[edit]

Is this acceptable for citation as critical comment on Wikipedia? Thought I might get an expert's opinion on this. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 01:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blogcritics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090716102225/http://blogcritics.org/writers/a/ to http://blogcritics.org/writers/a/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]