Talk:Black Velvet (whisky)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Black Velvet (whisky) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Article name[edit]

This article should be moved/renamed to match the proper title of the beverage. The product(s) made under the Black Velvet name are advert'd simply as Black Velvet. The article should rightly be moved to provide proper caps...perhaps under the article title Black Velvet (Canadian whisky). 156.34.232.31 01:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. I changed it to Black Velvet (whisky), I hope that's ok.--Commander Keane 02:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Schenley's in WWII[edit]

I have several sources that say Black Velvet (then Black Label) was available during WWII since at least 1943, which would seem to contradict "since 1945." Rees11 (talk) 16:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YACK[edit]

The article forget to mention that this particular brand of whiskey is bottom-shelf, vomit inducing nastiness. It should be called "Black Out Velvet". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:9FC0:7:ECEA:F2B5:A861:1A97 (talk) 10:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]