Talk:Bjørnfjell Station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dates[edit]

How, since the old station was opened in 1913, there is a photograph dated 1906, I don't know. But the 1913 date is definitely correct, and the dating on the photo here (it appears to be from the "National Library", so you'd think they know what they're doing) is indeed 1905-1906. So I don't know. But the Norwegians have cheerfully ignored this anomaly, so I guess if it's good enough for them, it's good enough for me. Herostratus (talk) 17:20, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the photo at the National Library of Norway is correctly dated. The thing is, the photo isn't of Bjørnefjell Station. The photo is clearly labelled Riksgränsen jernbanestasjon by the National library. The uploader has made a mistake when uploading the photo. Manxruler (talk) 22:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. Thanks for finding and correcting that. Herostratus (talk) 02:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Correct photo now added. Manxruler (talk) 03:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Golden. Herostratus (talk) 05:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bjørnfjell Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]