Talk:BitLicense

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Creation of law[edit]

It would be useful to see someone familiar with the politics of the state to describe the rationale for this license, whom the authors are and to what degree the state officials were compensated to sign off on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.138.223.233 (talk) 17:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the formal regulatory material in the New York State Register (the government gazette), which officially expounds on the regulations that were proposed and adopted. The gazette is the main official source of such information, as most people in the US and EU (Germany especially included) probably don't know. The rest is politics. int21h (talk · contribs · email) 21:02, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Highly Corrupt Institution[edit]

Bitlicense is a communist System to push certain cryptocurencies "ripple" by the forces behind it, why is this article still online? this whole system is not neutral it is a commercial pseudolegit scam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.150.93.79 (talk) 07:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]