Talk:Bisexual literature

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Good evaluation, Celia, particularly on the need for better sources for citations. Jlbrandt (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ceradams. Peer reviewers: Kaylac8215.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review - Kayla Jones[edit]

Overall, I'm very impressed with the amount of work you've put into this page!! It looks great so far. Here are some of my notes:

Add more to the lead that explains the article: A little on the background, some info on publishers, etc.
THe second sentence in "overview," "Though bisexuality..." feels like a run on sentence. Maybe split it up some. "Fanny Hill. The mid..." It reads very confusingly and when I got to the section later on discussing the Pre-1900s, I was very confused.
"was understood contemporaries by his contemporaries..." in the pre-1900 section doesn't make sense.
Need a citation for "modern adaptations" of Dorian Gray
"Bisexual characters...Giovanni's Room." - maybe reformat the sentence. It reads awkwardly
1990s - more citations, especially in last sentence.
Good information on the publishers!!
Citations needed in Children & Young adult
Maybe include a section detailing the need for positive images of bisexuality? Like journal articles or whatever that proves why it is necessary to include. How the negative representations harm individuals who are bisexual.
"A recent example..." can become outdated. Maybe use a different word like the year. - Under fantasy

Kaylac8215 (talk) 16:47, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]